* get indexed
* get rss-fed
* get atomized
| october 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sun | mon | tue | wed | thu | fri | sat |
| 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | |||
| 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
archives...
* august 2008 (1)* july 2008 (13)
* june 2008 (2)
* may 2008 (3)
* february 2008 (2)
* january 2008 (3)
* december 2007 (5)
* november 2007 (1)
* july 2007 (22)
* june 2007 (5)
* may 2007 (3)
* april 2007 (2)
* january 2007 (1)
* december 2006 (1)
* november 2006 (1)
* october 2006 (7)
* september 2006 (1)
* august 2006 (4)
* july 2006 (5)
* june 2006 (4)
* may 2006 (6)
* april 2006 (1)
* march 2006 (4)
* february 2006 (5)
* january 2006 (3)
* december 2005 (4)
* november 2005 (2)
* october 2005 (3)
* september 2005 (4)
* august 2005 (3)
* july 2005 (2)
writing activity stats
blogrolls...
* alfie* hgb blogs
* karmakiller
* pvnc
powered by: blosxom
Tue, 05 Dec 2006
...against bLog-spammers. ok, if those guys would at least spam cool URLs with awesome content, but it's just sh**. who's interested in mature women having sex with horses, swallowing cum, getting raped by big hung black men, drinking piss and getting spanked? NO ONE! it must be YOUNG women, not mature ones - but they don't get it. so, i've taken the step that hurts me pretty much. i included one of those "can you read these wiggly, crossed-out, skewed, and rotated characters?"-images, which tells you the ... uh ... secret code you can enter to get your comment posted on my site. in order to keep spammers out, it lacks a bit of userfriendliness. so, if you accidentally enter the wrong code the first time you loaded the comment-page you have to copy your comment, reload the site and re-enter your comment. sorry for this inconvenience, but actually comments are pretty rare on this bLog, so who cares about user-friendliness? and hey, my characters are NOT wiggly, crossed-out, skewed or rotated - cool, isn't it? if no one comments on my boring stuff here, maybe i'll switch to the old system again, so i get at least some comments. well, feel free to try it out. i think it _should_ work (yes, in theory). tech-talk from now on: i used Image::Magick to annotate a string into the JPEG file and then compare some superly secretly calculated hash-sums of both the input- string and the original-string. if they match, it's either a cool com- ment by some cool reader of my cool boring log (which would be pretty cool), or some poor little child in india/china/russia that has to enter comments to super highly secured anti-botish blog-comment scripts (which is definitely extremely uncool) by hand, like the one i am using now. well, let's see if it helps. ps: tech-talk comment on my SE-k750i will be posted soon...
[ comments (1) // permanent link ]